I'm afraid I have to admit, when iPad was first mentioned and pictures of it were posted, I thought: this looks so futuristic.
Obviously I was only attracted by its looks at that point until I realised that there's almost zero technological advancement in it. It's just an over-size iPod touch. And later another epiphany hit me: I'd rather have a small notebook than this!
Steve Jobs: "What do you mean we taped 4 iTouch gadgets together?"
When the iTouch came out, people were ecstatic.. but when the newest iPhone was born, people were moaning in pleasure; rightfully so. You see, the iPhone is basically an iTouch that calls. The iPhone revolution deserves its hype. It calls, it takes pictures, it has thousand of applications, its got huge memory, brilliant colours and everything else you can imagine all INSIDE YOUR POCKET. Portability made the iPhone so phenomenal. If we wanted functions only a computer can provide, we'd buy a small notebook. However, if we crave portability, you've got to give in to the iPhone. It may not have the powerful functions of a computer but it really is convenient. The iPhone is a generalist really, not specialising in any departments (except for being a phone of course), but having the lot of it and being able to fit in your pocket.
The iPad is all this, except YOU CAN'T CALL FROM IT!
Give me 100 kgs of blu-tack please.
So it's just a hugely over-sized iTouch then.
They're selling the most basic iPad for more than USD$500. This thing has NO technological advancements. It's just made BIGGER and it's christened as though it's an entirely new thing; a revolution. Now we let you off the hook for producing the iPhone after the iTouch because the iTouch was awesome but the iPhone was EVEN BETTER. No such thing for the iPad. It's just bigger and I seriously doubt any major efforts behind it. It's always been harder to make things smaller and more powerful, not vice-versa. So instead of calling it an entirely new thing, why not call it 'iTouch X-treme' or 'iTouch Supasize Meh' or 'iTouch Obese' ? That way you don't get ridiculed by all the tech enthusiasts in the world. I'm not even a tech enthusiast but I felt an extreme urge to bash the iPad.
To put it frankly, I feel that what Apple have been doing pre-iPad was revolutionary. Personally I didn't even think of buying the iPhone because everyone wanted to be special and get one. Sure. Now you're special, just like everyone else. Just like the 1 million iPhone users in Melbourne City probably. It's over-used so I'd rather steer clear and not be a sheep.
Also, I've always been irritated at fanboys of Apple. Not sure why. I don't hate apple products. I love the way they make their computers and their phones and music players but I think it must've been the fanboys that drove me off the i[Name] fanfare.
So please fanboys, shush! Don't irritate me again.
Here're a few interesting points about this gadget:
1. No camera - No comments here but I'd doubt you'd wanna use such a big, flimsy, floppy camera. I can't imagine anyone wanting to carry the iPad around on the street. Being without a camera obviously means no webcam-ing as well. Besides, if it did come with a camera, isn't it a pain to hold that thing while looking at the screen? It's not exactly as ergonomic, small and light as the iPhone. I think I'd rather get a small laptop now.
2. Touch keyboard - The reason, at the level of technology now, I will not buy anything 'touch screen' is because keypads are simply more convenient now. They are also more user friendly. So unless you wanna look futuristic, like half of the world, I'd stay away. From what I've read, the iPhone touch keyboard hasn't been very friendly either and is problematic. Of course, Apple knows that there are dim people out there as well and has exploited this by allowing you to buy an iPad keyboard for only $70!
3. Lack of input - This thing lacks card slots AND USB ports. For something aspiring to be more like a laptop, it has failed here. USB ports are hugely important, especially for school-goers, tech savvy people and working people. Without it, it's vastly difficult and frustrating to transfer files. Also, without this USB port, you can not use anything that isn't Apple, which directs me back to point 2: iPad keyboard for only $70! No, that keyboard is for nothing but the iPad.
4. Closed applications - Once again despite wanting to be like a netbook, the iPad fails here. You can only download from the App store (which are approved and added by Apple). No external softwares for you unless you buy a laptop.
5. No flash - I almost vomited my breakfast seeing. How can any tech enthusiast live without flash today? It just makes the world less... flashy!
6. No multi-tasking - Unlike the netbook it aspires to be like, you can only use 1 program at once. HOW is this not an obese iTouch? Come on it's not much more creative and innovative than making a bigger brick, a bigger door handle or a bigger sanitary pad. My netbook can open more than 1 program at once :) and I like it that way. Very unfriendly indeed for something that is supposed to be an advancement and a close relative of the netbook. You'd think you'd get something that works better when it's so big??? NOT! Once again it's just an over-sized iTouch. No hint of it being anywhere close to a netbook. Bill Gates must be laughing his ass off now. I personally like to think that when it comes to buying Apple laptops and computers, 50% of what you pay to Apple is for the impressive looks. Functionally, it really is slightly inferior compared to what a PC can achieve. That's a whole new debate that I can't be bothered dwelling into now.
One thing also, that the iPad is supposed to be revolutionary at is that u can read newspapers and ebooks with it and it looks cool! Yeah, it does look cool but to be honest I really believe that newspapers and books should never be and will never be replaced especially with current technology. It just hurts my eyes to read tiny words on a screen that's blaring radiation into my retina. I often prefer printing long long articles when I wish to read it and especially when it's important. I remember doing my journal article appraisal on Warfarin vs Aspirin for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation. It was just 12 pages of font 8 words packed tightly. Initially I thought I could pull it off without printing but I was wrong. It's just too straining and to be honest, I don't think the iPad should be a replacement for your newspapers and books.
Edit: Okay, after giving it some thought, perhaps it is alright to read your news and casual books on a screen but not with a screen the size of the iPad that's for sure. What I should've said was that for students, books really should come in hard copy. Something you need to study for should not be on a screen. It's just too little interaction between you and the study material. It's fine if you are just looking for information online but if you are to study or scrutinise something, it's better to do it via the hard copy. This applies also to workers who need to scrutinise documents.
To put simply, buy the iPad if you're into stuff that LOOKS cool, impressive and modern. If you're, at any degree buying it for its function, go get an iPhone (portable iPad), or get a TV or a camera, or a PS3.
Thank you for reading :)
And now a word from our sponsor:
Hitler. Heil Fuhrer.
Disclaimer: No I'm not pro-Nazi
Credits: dailymail.co.uk